Immigrants from Oceania vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,895,818 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.697. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 59.3 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $54,958, a difference of 17.2%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $95,114, a difference of 11.9%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.43%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.72%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.6%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.77%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 133.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%).