Swedish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,646,948 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 35.1 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 28.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $54,958, a difference of 14.1%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $95,114, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.78%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $45,214, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 68.8%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 61.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 40.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.0%), currently married (50.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 234.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 63.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.7%).