Crow vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Ecuadorians
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,055,653 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.354% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 353.5 Ecuadorians.
Crow vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $41,958, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $82,070, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $91,574, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,911, a difference of 14.7%).
Income Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 86.2%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 83.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.9% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 200.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 199.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 191.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 82.3% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.3%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Poor 33.3% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 106.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 74.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 80.2%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.30%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Crow vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.60%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |