Canadian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,066,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 18.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $54,958, a difference of 13.2%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $95,114, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $53,911, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($47,911 compared to $45,214, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 41.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.5%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 173.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 76.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).