Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha

4.6%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 68178 100.0% 33.5% (+66.5)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#59
2. 68102 87.1% 33.5% (+53.7)#5 35.2% (+52.0)#520
3. 68131 73.4% 33.5% (+39.9)#6 35.2% (+38.2)#893
4. 68111 60.7% 33.5% (+27.3)#12 35.2% (+25.5)#1,738
5. 68105 56.6% 33.5% (+23.2)#14 35.2% (+21.4)#2,142
6. 68127 55.3% 33.5% (+21.8)#17 35.2% (+20.1)#2,295
7. 68108 52.6% 33.5% (+19.1)#20 35.2% (+17.4)#2,688
8. 68114 51.5% 33.5% (+18.0)#21 35.2% (+16.3)#2,851
9. 68110 50.7% 33.5% (+17.3)#23 35.2% (+15.5)#2,982
10. 68132 45.0% 33.5% (+11.6)#28 35.2% (+9.86)#4,040
11. 68134 44.8% 33.5% (+11.3)#29 35.2% (+9.60)#4,117
12. 68106 43.3% 33.5% (+9.86)#34 35.2% (+8.13)#4,494
13. 68104 41.3% 33.5% (+7.84)#46 35.2% (+6.11)#5,019
14. 68154 40.0% 33.5% (+6.54)#55 35.2% (+4.81)#5,417
15. 68107 38.1% 33.5% (+4.69)#65 35.2% (+2.96)#6,041
16. 68124 37.0% 33.5% (+3.57)#71 35.2% (+1.84)#6,476
17. 68164 36.1% 33.5% (+2.61)#74 35.2% (+0.885)#6,874
18. 68137 34.8% 33.5% (+1.30)#94 35.2% (-0.433)#7,477
19. 68144 32.2% 33.5% (-1.22)#114 35.2% (-2.95)#8,712
20. 68157 31.0% 33.5% (-2.50)#129 35.2% (-4.23)#9,460
21. 68112 27.7% 33.5% (-5.79)#170 35.2% (-7.52)#11,626
22. 68138 25.1% 33.5% (-8.33)#203 35.2% (-10.1)#13,511
23. 68152 23.0% 33.5% (-10.4)#249 35.2% (-12.2)#15,398
24. 68117 21.7% 33.5% (-11.7)#277 35.2% (-13.4)#16,591
25. 68130 21.6% 33.5% (-11.9)#281 35.2% (-13.6)#16,761
26. 68116 20.4% 33.5% (-13.0)#295 35.2% (-14.7)#17,781
27. 68118 18.7% 33.5% (-14.8)#326 35.2% (-16.5)#19,484
28. 68122 18.3% 33.5% (-15.1)#333 35.2% (-16.8)#19,821
29. 68135 10.0% 33.5% (-23.5)#496 35.2% (-25.2)#27,342
30. 68136 9.8% 33.5% (-23.6)#499 35.2% (-25.4)#27,435
31. 68142 4.6% 33.5% (-28.9)#546 35.2% (-30.6)#30,229

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE are:
#1
100.0%
#2
87.1%
#3
73.4%
#4
60.7%
#5
56.6%
#6
55.3%
#7
52.6%
#8
51.5%
#9
50.7%
#10
45.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
68178 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Omaha is 42.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Nebraska is 33.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.