Potawatomi vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Potawatomi
Chippewa
7.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,764,729 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 23.9% | 20.9% |
| Range | 20.7% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 9.1% |
| Median | 10.4% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Apache (7.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Osage (7.4%, a difference of 0.95%), American (7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Dominican (7.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |