Navajo vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,168,929 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $46,876, a difference of 61.5%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $108,691, a difference of 53.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $106,217, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $52,190, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $41,375, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.6%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 102.3%), and married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 98.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 42.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 49.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 89.2%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.8%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 85.2%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 79.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.5%).