European vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
European
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Europeans
Chickasaw
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,036,354 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 24.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 15.3% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 84.7% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 43.6% | 35.8% |
| Median | 30.4% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.6% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.6% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.1% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Europeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |