Estonian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Estonian
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Estonians
Chickasaw
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,457,467 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Estonians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 22.2% | 17.6% |
| Range | 21.1% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), American (5.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |