Egyptian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Egyptian
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Egyptians
Chickasaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,851,479 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.028 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 64.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 5.4% | 21.2% |
| Range | 4.5% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.89% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Nicaraguan (2.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |