Ecuadorian vs Serbian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,643,393 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Serbians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.9%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $107,157, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $57,975, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $40,539, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,106, a difference of 5.5%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $87,572, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 51.3%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 44.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.7%), currently married (43.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 141.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 16.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.7%).