Australian vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,205,037 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 122.8 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,426, a difference of 14.6%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $105,609, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $86,920, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,247, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,673, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 5.8%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%).