Chippewa vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,276,526 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,426, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,913, a difference of 23.8%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $57,309, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,247, a difference of 6.9%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,510, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,673, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.2%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.3%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.8%).