Immigrants from Oceania vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,623,113 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.964. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $44,822, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $44,356, a difference of 21.0%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 89.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 73.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 55.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 106.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 99.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.45%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 64.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.7%).