Welsh vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,029,102 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,322 compared to $72,093, a difference of 39.2%), householder income over 65 years ($60,666 compared to $44,822, a difference of 35.3%), and median family income ($102,151 compared to $76,188, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,647 compared to $50,547, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,597 compared to $44,356, a difference of 14.1%), and median earnings ($45,710 compared to $38,949, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 80.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 69.0%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 25.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 37.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.5%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 94.6%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 50.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.6%).