Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Houma

Exceptional
Tragic
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,392,481 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.954. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 105.3 Houma.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $72,093, a difference of 53.5%), median household income ($94,222 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.6%), and per capita income ($49,463 compared to $32,996, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $50,547, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $44,356, a difference of 25.2%), and median earnings ($51,337 compared to $38,949, a difference of 31.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 99.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 87.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.9%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 67.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 142.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 123.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 122.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 87.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaHouma
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%