Romanian vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Houma

Excellent
Tragic
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,239,369 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Houma.
Romanian Integration in Houma Communities

Romanian vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $72,093, a difference of 50.6%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $62,575, a difference of 47.0%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $32,996, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $50,547, a difference of 18.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $44,356, a difference of 20.9%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $38,949, a difference of 29.0%).
Romanian vs Houma Income
Income MetricRomanianHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
38.7%

Romanian vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 87.8%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 79.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.4%).
Romanian vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianHouma
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.5%

Romanian vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Romanian vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%

Romanian vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Romanian vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
74.1%

Romanian vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 61.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Romanian vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianHouma
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
46.6%

Romanian vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Romanian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianHouma
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%

Romanian vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 138.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 117.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Romanian vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
0.96%

Romanian vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.7%).
Romanian vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricRomanianHouma
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%