Swedish vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,092,258 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 26.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $72,093, a difference of 47.6%), median family income ($108,499 compared to $76,188, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($88,524 compared to $62,575, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,445 compared to $50,547, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $44,356, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 105.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 93.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 51.9%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 53.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 87.4%), male unemployment (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 57.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 68.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 106.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 104.9%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.6%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.2%).