Japanese vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,249,878 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 55.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 62.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $72,093, a difference of 34.3%), and median household income ($83,395 compared to $62,575, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $50,547, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($44,825 compared to $38,949, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 79.1%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 75.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.8%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 55.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 47.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 32.4%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 56.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.8%).