Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Houma

Fair
Tragic
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,656,916 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 58.6 Houma.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 78.2%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $44,822, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $50,547, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,169 compared to $38,949, a difference of 0.57%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $44,356, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $62,575, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 73.8%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 69.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 26.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.7%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 24.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoHouma
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%