Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Omaha
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha

19.8%
69.8%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 68116 69.8% 33.9% (+35.9)#3 33.4% (+36.4)#175
2. 68112 55.1% 33.9% (+21.2)#93 33.4% (+21.7)#2,871
3. 68164 52.0% 33.9% (+18.1)#119 33.4% (+18.6)#3,838
4. 68118 51.3% 33.9% (+17.4)#125 33.4% (+17.9)#4,094
5. 68137 48.5% 33.9% (+14.6)#148 33.4% (+15.1)#5,068
6. 68122 48.5% 33.9% (+14.6)#149 33.4% (+15.1)#5,076
7. 68134 45.1% 33.9% (+11.2)#179 33.4% (+11.7)#6,367
8. 68136 44.6% 33.9% (+10.7)#185 33.4% (+11.2)#6,542
9. 68135 43.5% 33.9% (+9.60)#192 33.4% (+10.1)#6,966
10. 68104 41.1% 33.9% (+7.20)#210 33.4% (+7.70)#7,915
11. 68127 36.8% 33.9% (+2.90)#237 33.4% (+3.40)#9,749
12. 68132 33.4% 33.9% (-0.500)#256 33.4% (=0.000)#11,224
13. 68154 33.2% 33.9% (-0.700)#258 33.4% (-0.200)#11,301
14. 68144 32.6% 33.9% (-1.30)#262 33.4% (-0.800)#11,546
15. 68117 29.8% 33.9% (-4.10)#279 33.4% (-3.60)#12,679
16. 68105 29.1% 33.9% (-4.80)#281 33.4% (-4.30)#12,935
17. 68131 28.9% 33.9% (-5.00)#282 33.4% (-4.50)#13,011
18. 68102 28.3% 33.9% (-5.60)#286 33.4% (-5.10)#13,255
19. 68108 27.8% 33.9% (-6.10)#288 33.4% (-5.60)#13,418
20. 68130 26.5% 33.9% (-7.40)#298 33.4% (-6.90)#13,871
21. 68110 25.7% 33.9% (-8.20)#300 33.4% (-7.70)#14,101
22. 68114 24.1% 33.9% (-9.80)#309 33.4% (-9.30)#14,547
23. 68107 23.4% 33.9% (-10.5)#313 33.4% (-10.00)#14,783
24. 68106 21.9% 33.9% (-12.0)#318 33.4% (-11.5)#15,306
25. 68124 21.0% 33.9% (-12.9)#323 33.4% (-12.4)#15,794
26. 68182 20.5% 33.9% (-13.4)#328 33.4% (-12.9)#16,119
27. 68178 20.0% 33.9% (-13.9)#329 33.4% (-13.4)#16,267
28. 68111 19.8% 33.9% (-14.1)#331 33.4% (-13.6)#16,336

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE are:
#1
69.8%
#2
55.1%
#3
52.0%
#4
51.3%
#5
48.5%
#6
48.5%
#7
45.1%
#8
44.6%
#9
43.5%
#10
41.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
68116 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE with 69.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha, NE?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Omaha is 27.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Nebraska is 33.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.