South African Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
Self-Care Disability
South African Self-Care Disability
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,494,090 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.253 and weighted average of 2.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.11% in percentage of population with self-care disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and percentage of population with self-care disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with self-care disability within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with self-care disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Argentina (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Swedish (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Mongolians | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Swedes | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Brazilians | 99.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 99.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| South Africans | 99.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
South African Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African Data | Self-Care Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.053% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 12.2% | 6.0% |
| Range | 12.1% | 5.4% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 1.3% |
Correlation Details
| South African Percentile | Sample Size | Self-Care Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 173,852,074 | 2.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 5,942,903 | 2.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 1,544,524 | 2.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 541,575 | 2.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 173,415 | 2.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 149,495 | 1.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 68,785 | 2.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 57,676 | 4.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 21,693 | 2.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 32,668 | 3.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 21,290 | 4.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 38,114 | 1.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 4,717 | 6.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 9,588 | 2.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 26,498 | 0.63% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 4,450 | 2.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 377 | 0.90% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 1,638 | 3.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 1,625 | 1.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 985 | 0.91% |