South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,602,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.052% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 33.5% | 60.5% |
Range | 33.5% | 55.9% |
Mean | 4.4% | 17.6% |
Median | 2.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.9% |
Correlation Details
South African Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.052% | 172,711,964 | 17.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 5,527,254 | 12.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 1,416,221 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 444,245 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 150,574 | 10.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 138,650 | 6.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 53,655 | 15.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 45,222 | 17.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 20,892 | 24.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 27,083 | 14.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 17,305 | 14.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 8,537 | 13.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 4,717 | 14.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 1,800 | 47.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 23,264 | 4.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 3,958 | 5.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 3,541 | 9.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 377 | 24.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 1,638 | 18.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 1,625 | 13.6% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.53% | 173 | 60.5% |