South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
15.2%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,617,887 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 15.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.62% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants from Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants from Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants from Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.052% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 33.5% | 34.6% |
Range | 33.5% | 32.6% |
Mean | 4.4% | 13.6% |
Median | 2.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
Correlation Details
South African Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.052% | 172,747,833 | 17.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 5,506,087 | 11.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 1,379,574 | 11.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 479,209 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 149,835 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 144,739 | 7.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 47,558 | 10.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 43,778 | 19.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 20,803 | 17.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 26,300 | 15.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 18,538 | 10.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 34,368 | 2.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 2,064 | 20.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 7,226 | 13.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.91% | 1,712 | 22.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 4,450 | 6.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 377 | 6.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 1,638 | 15.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 1,625 | 5.7% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.53% | 173 | 34.6% |