South African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
South African Single Female Poverty
20.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.3% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South Africans and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South Africans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if South Africans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
South African Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.052% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 7.6% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 23.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 18.4% |
Correlation Details
| South African Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.052% | 172,852,886 | 21.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 5,617,109 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 1,411,839 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 464,490 | 18.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 150,524 | 17.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 129,851 | 14.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 52,259 | 22.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 43,925 | 23.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 19,657 | 15.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 27,083 | 24.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 10,557 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 35,604 | 7.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 4,717 | 22.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 7,226 | 25.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 23,264 | 12.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 4,450 | 13.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 3,541 | 33.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 1,638 | 27.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 1,625 | 21.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 65 | 100.0% |