French American Indian vs Immigrants from Denmark Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,887,093 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.734% in Immigrants from Denmark. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 734.3 Immigrants from Denmark.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $53,799, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $120,445, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $116,000, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $52,612, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $43,646, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (62.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 74.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 70.9%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Denmark communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.9%).