Bhutanese vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Cypriots

Exceptional
Excellent
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,450,500 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 85.2 Cypriots.
Bhutanese Integration in Cypriot Communities

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $54,899, a difference of 10.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,209, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $116,364, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $71,714, a difference of 0.80%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $102,843, a difference of 2.7%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricBhutaneseCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.5%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.9%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
84.1%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.2%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseCypriot
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.0%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 79.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.8%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.0%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.6%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Bhutanese vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.32%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Bhutanese vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseCypriot
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%