Choctaw vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Cypriots

Fair
Excellent
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,221,177 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 103.4 Cypriots.
Choctaw Integration in Cypriot Communities

Choctaw vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $54,899, a difference of 52.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $123,396, a difference of 50.0%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $127,064, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,209, a difference of 14.9%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $45,570, a difference of 34.9%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricChoctawCypriot
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.3%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 68.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 25.4%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawCypriot
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
8.9%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawCypriot
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.3%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawCypriot
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
27.0%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 98.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 38.4%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.0%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 114.9%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 97.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Choctaw vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 75.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.3%).
Choctaw vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricChoctawCypriot
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%