Bhutanese vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,714,357 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $29,031, a difference of 71.9%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $59,159, a difference of 69.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $69,759, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.7%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $33,046, a difference of 32.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $42,380, a difference of 34.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 189.4%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 166.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 141.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 57.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 66.5%), and single female poverty (17.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 78.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 114.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 101.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 84.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.3%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 82.3%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 60.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.2%).