Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,867,945 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 22.1 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $29,031, a difference of 78.3%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $70,989, a difference of 63.6%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $59,159, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $42,380, a difference of 28.2%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $33,046, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 158.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 145.2%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 122.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 65.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 106.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 100.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 81.4%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (63.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.3%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 102.6%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 96.7%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 58.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.5%).