Romanian vs Navajo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Navajo

Excellent
Poor
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Navajo Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,003,566 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 51.3 Navajo.
Romanian Integration in Navajo Communities

Romanian vs Navajo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $29,031, a difference of 66.9%), median family income ($111,243 compared to $70,989, a difference of 56.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $69,759, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.0%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $33,046, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $42,380, a difference of 26.6%).
Romanian vs Navajo Income
Income MetricRomanianNavajo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$29,031
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$70,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$59,159
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$36,999
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$42,098
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$33,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$42,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$66,529
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$69,759
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$47,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
22.4%

Romanian vs Navajo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 145.0%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 130.5%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 44.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 59.6%), and single female poverty (19.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 61.3%).
Romanian vs Navajo Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianNavajo
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
22.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
30.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
30.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
31.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
29.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
40.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
21.1%

Romanian vs Navajo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 107.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 98.5%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.5%).
Romanian vs Navajo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianNavajo
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
29.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%

Romanian vs Navajo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Romanian vs Navajo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianNavajo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
56.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
69.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
32.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
72.8%

Romanian vs Navajo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 79.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 57.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Romanian vs Navajo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianNavajo
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.65
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
39.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Romanian vs Navajo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Romanian vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianNavajo
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.2%

Romanian vs Navajo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.9%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 82.1%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Romanian vs Navajo Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianNavajo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
92.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
87.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
85.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
50.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
23.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
9.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Romanian vs Navajo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.7%).
Romanian vs Navajo Disability
Disability MetricRomanianNavajo
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
33.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
58.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%