Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,047,286 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $29,031, a difference of 85.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $66,529, a difference of 77.4%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $59,159, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $42,380, a difference of 34.8%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $33,046, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 146.9%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 143.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 133.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 51.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 53.3%), and single mother poverty (26.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 54.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 114.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 113.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 105.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 105.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 73.5%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.65, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 128.6%), master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 120.9%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 119.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 76.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 73.4%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.2%).