Immigrants from Jordan vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,215,334 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 23.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $29,031, a difference of 55.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $69,759, a difference of 52.2%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $70,989, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $42,380, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $33,046, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 131.7%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 120.3%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 105.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 48.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 58.7%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 100.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 93.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 77.8%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.1%), bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.5%).