Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Navajo
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,023,568 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.944. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.703% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 703.4 Navajo.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $29,031, a difference of 75.4%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $70,989, a difference of 61.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $69,759, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $42,380, a difference of 22.1%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $33,046, a difference of 30.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 162.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 139.1%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 112.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 45.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 61.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 109.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 103.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 14.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 76.9%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (62.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.8%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 103.2%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 102.0%), and bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Navajo |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |