Tlingit-Haida Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Tlingit-Haida Single Female Poverty
21.9%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
5.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,536,912 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147 and weighted average of 21.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tlingit-Haida influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Tlingit-Haida simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Welsh (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Thailand (22.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
Tlingit-Haida Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.036% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 76.8% | 50.0% |
| Range | 76.8% | 43.3% |
| Mean | 20.3% | 25.9% |
| Median | 10.7% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.3% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.9% | 9.8% |
Correlation Details
| Tlingit-Haida Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.036% | 58,838,102 | 21.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,242,049 | 21.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 218,459 | 21.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 79,677 | 28.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 18,741 | 40.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 7,382 | 24.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 608 | 50.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 698 | 20.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 544 | 13.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 420 | 41.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.91% | 564 | 25.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,146 | 6.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 146 | 29.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 9.00% | 6,691 | 20.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 2,902 | 11.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 29,933 | 18.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 32,108 | 19.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 13,913 | 22.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 18,041 | 21.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 8,168 | 25.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.26% | 2,169 | 36.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.92% | 1,727 | 23.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 4,267 | 22.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.55% | 1,073 | 29.2% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.78% | 920 | 41.7% |
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.33% | 1,792 | 15.8% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.24% | 804 | 41.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.59% | 361 | 31.2% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.41% | 1,602 | 15.3% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.63% | 67 | 33.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.85% | 838 | 28.2% |