Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty
19.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,087,969 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 19.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 11.2% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Scotland influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Scotland simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants from Scotland Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.020% | 10.1% |
| Maximum | 3.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 3.1% | 89.9% |
| Mean | 1.1% | 26.0% |
| Median | 0.95% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.46% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.7% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.76% | 15.5% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Scotland Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 141,852,398 | 21.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.069% | 30,797,332 | 17.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 9,906,239 | 18.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 4,522,309 | 18.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,748,348 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 1,298,145 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 899,277 | 18.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 446,940 | 17.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 380,517 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 349,748 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 290,604 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 102,272 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 109,870 | 15.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 62,582 | 25.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 68,785 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 15,590 | 39.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 16,903 | 15.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 48,665 | 26.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 14,782 | 14.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 31,124 | 17.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 598 | 26.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 1,991 | 30.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 18,266 | 32.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 4,997 | 16.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 17,943 | 35.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 1,528 | 10.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 33,544 | 14.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 18,856 | 17.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 1,766 | 41.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 2,323 | 45.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,570 | 31.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 279 | 50.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 7,430 | 23.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 1,925 | 30.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 2,023 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,347 | 45.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 1,260 | 31.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 2,069 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 1,824 | 22.4% |