Sudanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Sudanese Single Female Poverty
22.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.48% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sudanese and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sudanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Sudanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Sudanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.020% | 8.0% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 48.2% |
| Range | 16.9% | 40.2% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 24.5% |
| Median | 1.7% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.83% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
| Sudanese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 68,789,778 | 24.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 13,776,286 | 21.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 7,051,970 | 22.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,621,554 | 21.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,455,738 | 20.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 2,229,026 | 17.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,688,414 | 22.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 895,222 | 25.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,073,442 | 21.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 973,619 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 988,836 | 25.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 504,957 | 29.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 824,893 | 21.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 328,164 | 22.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 394,831 | 20.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 195,444 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 277,628 | 19.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 230,407 | 20.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 214,821 | 29.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 107,636 | 23.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 205,660 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 361,784 | 21.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 88,402 | 18.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 47,024 | 21.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 84,796 | 26.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 113,562 | 25.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 266,931 | 21.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 58,210 | 22.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 24,018 | 38.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 62,837 | 18.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 39,237 | 24.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 6,278 | 48.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 11,427 | 29.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 35,223 | 16.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 119,866 | 23.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 21,801 | 25.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 52,472 | 26.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 12,595 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 29,580 | 24.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 33,194 | 28.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 82,775 | 27.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 43,183 | 23.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 404 | 42.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 29,261 | 9.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 51,386 | 33.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 8,283 | 17.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 13,087 | 9.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 66,249 | 18.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 8,259 | 41.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 25,129 | 17.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 21,583 | 9.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 3,093 | 14.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 31,976 | 14.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 1,082 | 42.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 3,440 | 18.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 1,822 | 48.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 22,340 | 44.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 495 | 15.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 24,028 | 40.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 2,586 | 20.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 9,681 | 27.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 590 | 47.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 9,917 | 13.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 10,086 | 41.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 2,727 | 8.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.12% | 1,206 | 30.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 3,056 | 23.7% |