Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty
22.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,196,728 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Bangladesh influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Bangladesh simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
| French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
| Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bangladesh Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.039% | 0.22% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 64.6% |
| Range | 20.9% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 23.7% |
| Median | 3.1% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 12.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Bangladesh Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.039% | 108,062,818 | 22.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 36,304,450 | 20.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 16,932,534 | 19.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 9,195,998 | 19.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 6,131,344 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 3,611,724 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 2,367,791 | 18.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 2,769,152 | 24.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 1,318,013 | 20.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 867,749 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 748,735 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 632,313 | 19.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 317,258 | 14.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 8,978,312 | 24.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 277,069 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 150,224 | 12.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 217,961 | 15.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 112,615 | 15.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 95,358 | 16.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 208,077 | 15.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 378,203 | 32.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 68,969 | 21.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 214,782 | 23.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 77,061 | 16.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 42,368 | 32.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 45,956 | 19.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 52,321 | 14.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 21,109 | 12.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 152,503 | 23.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 26,406 | 12.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 164,756 | 33.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 6,062 | 22.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 19,733 | 0.22% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 9,973 | 38.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 46,794 | 23.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 145,098 | 19.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27% | 94,815 | 37.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 90,548 | 23.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.57% | 44,490 | 28.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 23,471 | 24.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.00% | 67,001 | 23.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 40,198 | 17.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 65,283 | 39.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 27,848 | 5.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 12,129 | 33.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 126,907 | 27.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 73,318 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 97,668 | 16.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 127,805 | 13.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 3,490 | 14.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 5,923 | 55.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 26,939 | 13.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 30,063 | 28.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 28,327 | 32.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 4,146 | 22.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.70% | 52,160 | 23.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 29,921 | 19.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 77,230 | 22.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 59,961 | 20.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 31,200 | 14.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 847 | 64.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.61% | 3,006 | 61.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 27,794 | 16.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 17,328 | 40.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.59% | 27,842 | 46.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.74% | 64,268 | 13.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.93% | 43,213 | 51.3% |