Portuguese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Portuguese Single Female Poverty
20.5%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,230,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 20.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Portuguese Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 50.5% |
| Range | 48.0% | 49.2% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 23.2% |
| Median | 16.0% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.1% | 27.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 10.3% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 343,128,315 | 22.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 51,806,827 | 18.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 18,748,915 | 17.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 9,481,659 | 18.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 5,145,929 | 17.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 2,576,239 | 21.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 2,202,460 | 17.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 1,307,078 | 18.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 632,143 | 18.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 801,090 | 18.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 609,995 | 21.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 681,741 | 18.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 394,316 | 19.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 371,556 | 23.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 246,765 | 19.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 349,977 | 15.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.19% | 101,450 | 13.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 139,005 | 15.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 132,215 | 23.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 131,913 | 22.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26% | 8,832 | 23.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.80% | 59,274 | 22.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.22% | 66,859 | 16.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.70% | 125,255 | 26.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.34% | 9,917 | 24.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.86% | 28,653 | 15.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 18,331 | 16.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.76% | 25,180 | 27.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,629 | 10.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.57% | 2,821 | 28.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.35% | 6,286 | 49.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 4,933 | 36.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 8,855 | 10.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 15,699 | 19.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 40,467 | 27.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 82,595 | 21.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.35% | 53,635 | 24.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.04% | 6,511 | 23.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 954 | 50.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.48% | 20,883 | 8.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.84% | 52,526 | 27.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.56% | 16,286 | 50.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.53% | 1,034 | 47.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.13% | 8,101 | 2.8% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.50% | 11,117 | 12.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.88% | 62,947 | 22.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.14% | 21,742 | 32.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.91% | 495 | 34.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.35% | 50,072 | 5.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.65% | 18,445 | 35.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.30% | 10,466 | 23.8% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.61% | 117,778 | 27.4% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.21% | 8,763 | 20.6% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.89% | 15,629 | 23.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.22% | 17,164 | 45.0% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.09% | 93,638 | 35.2% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 43,238 | 28.6% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 30,558 | 29.1% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.05% | 21,383 | 12.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.59% | 4,556 | 21.2% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.14% | 6,484 | 21.8% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.44% | 11,431 | 1.2% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.45% | 25,084 | 26.1% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.18% | 4,660 | 33.9% |