Arab Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Arab Single Female Poverty
20.7%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Arab Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 64.1% | 53.6% |
| Range | 63.9% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 23.1% |
| Median | 10.1% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 11.3% |
Correlation Details
| Arab Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 193,814,902 | 24.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 125,459,645 | 20.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 72,448,908 | 20.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 38,711,593 | 20.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,321,469 | 19.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 10,880,986 | 17.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,665,064 | 19.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,123,071 | 16.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.50% | 1,954,783 | 17.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,010,251 | 21.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 902,519 | 18.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 795,688 | 15.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 637,690 | 17.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 384,491 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 214,186 | 18.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30% | 384,647 | 17.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.66% | 264,823 | 13.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 94,906 | 30.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 248,890 | 25.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 192,234 | 19.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.50% | 79,353 | 18.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 314,385 | 18.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.37% | 29,799 | 43.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 73,805 | 12.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 19,825 | 11.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 96,749 | 12.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 124,912 | 14.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 142,898 | 23.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 46,979 | 16.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.13% | 37,093 | 10.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,082 | 35.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.55% | 33,174 | 5.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,580 | 16.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 1,215 | 30.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 15.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 22.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,278 | 39.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.45% | 645 | 19.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 19.00% | 7,570 | 21.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 51.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 53.5% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,842 | 46.6% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 10.2% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,474 | 28.2% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 53.6% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 26.7% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 21.3% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 25.2% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 41.0% |