Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Egyptian Single Female Poverty
19.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.9% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.048% | 11.6% |
Maximum | 10.4% | 52.0% |
Range | 10.4% | 40.4% |
Mean | 3.0% | 20.8% |
Median | 2.4% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 8.0% |
Correlation Details
Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 147,653,769 | 22.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 56,793,989 | 20.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 19,850,209 | 17.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,513,926 | 19.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,196,120 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,654,567 | 16.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,149,344 | 17.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,320,634 | 17.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,722,504 | 14.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,920,976 | 20.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 781,559 | 18.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 644,614 | 17.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 714,556 | 16.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 378,563 | 19.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 389,261 | 15.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 468,199 | 19.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 290,419 | 13.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,794 | 21.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 260,220 | 20.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 107,375 | 13.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 23,389 | 14.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 75,833 | 26.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.50% | 3,519 | 11.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 14.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 103,152 | 17.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 84,932 | 17.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 1,869 | 24.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 12.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,794 | 19.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 30.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 744 | 40.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,086 | 15.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 55,847 | 24.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 59,177 | 12.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 9,535 | 22.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 35,422 | 15.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 25.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 23.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 19.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 2,391 | 36.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 16.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 22.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 39.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 52.0% |