Samoan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Samoan Single Female Poverty
20.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.00% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Samoans and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Samoans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Samoans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Samoan Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 62.7% |
| Range | 20.3% | 58.7% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 23.3% |
| Median | 4.1% | 20.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 13.2% |
Correlation Details
| Samoan Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 144,927,165 | 23.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 35,509,372 | 20.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 12,787,691 | 20.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 8,592,107 | 20.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 5,505,594 | 20.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 3,109,960 | 20.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,376,218 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 2,019,930 | 18.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 1,398,971 | 20.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 1,070,265 | 18.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 843,186 | 24.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 673,434 | 20.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 684,070 | 20.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 268,614 | 21.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 436,704 | 15.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 387,116 | 19.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 309,301 | 23.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 250,070 | 19.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 165,009 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 194,725 | 20.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 436,590 | 16.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 35,370 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 75,894 | 21.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 373,158 | 19.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 169,339 | 23.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.80% | 25,082 | 16.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 51,899 | 36.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 64,631 | 10.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 55,856 | 16.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 103,784 | 16.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 39,480 | 5.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 117,983 | 16.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 61,753 | 9.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 51,223 | 33.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 41,455 | 17.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.89% | 12,026 | 10.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 12,775 | 16.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.13% | 74,292 | 14.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 41,733 | 20.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 17,867 | 12.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 11,029 | 27.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 365 | 10.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 19,873 | 9.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 36,331 | 14.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 57,907 | 23.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.47% | 25,427 | 15.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.67% | 8,205 | 30.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.04% | 72,324 | 14.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 229 | 52.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 10,098 | 9.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.60% | 2,122 | 27.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 7,551 | 18.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 696 | 62.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.14% | 5,743 | 29.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 17,628 | 34.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 2,564 | 38.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.90% | 51,367 | 30.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.11% | 3,909 | 15.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 465 | 13.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 10,042 | 41.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.14% | 38,142 | 30.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 4,555 | 27.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.48% | 620 | 59.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.66% | 5,921 | 47.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.88% | 377 | 57.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.09% | 649 | 10.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 382 | 28.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.61% | 3,593 | 35.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.21% | 12,370 | 12.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.51% | 2,742 | 4.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.60% | 1,949 | 56.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.14% | 1,897 | 56.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.32% | 2,274 | 4.0% |