British Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
British Single Female Poverty
21.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 515,067,219 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674 and weighted average of 21.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.8% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of British and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of British influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if British simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to British by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Slovak (21.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (21.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Scandinavian (21.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Denmark (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (21.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 76.5 /100 | #168 | Good 21.2% |
| Nepalese | 76.5 /100 | #169 | Good 21.2% |
| Slavs | 76.4 /100 | #170 | Good 21.3% |
| South Africans | 76.4 /100 | #171 | Good 21.3% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 76.4 /100 | #172 | Good 21.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 76.3 /100 | #173 | Good 21.3% |
| Danes | 76.1 /100 | #174 | Good 21.3% |
| British | 75.9 /100 | #175 | Good 21.4% |
| Slovaks | 75.9 /100 | #176 | Good 21.4% |
| Scandinavians | 75.7 /100 | #177 | Good 21.4% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 75.7 /100 | #178 | Good 21.4% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 75.6 /100 | #179 | Good 21.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 75.6 /100 | #180 | Good 21.4% |
| Moroccans | 75.6 /100 | #181 | Good 21.4% |
| Belgians | 75.4 /100 | #182 | Good 21.5% |
British Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 11.5% |
| Maximum | 64.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.6% | 88.5% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 44.4% |
| Median | 8.2% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 39.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 28.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 28.5% |
Correlation Details
| British Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 129,597,760 | 25.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 154,998,130 | 23.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 102,035,400 | 21.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 61,841,395 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 31,106,757 | 19.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 16,251,246 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 7,837,834 | 19.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.00% | 3,886,271 | 19.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 2,754,012 | 20.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,361,364 | 22.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,001,631 | 17.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 656,736 | 16.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 561,859 | 17.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 195,884 | 20.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.90% | 243,512 | 20.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 189,954 | 14.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 101,247 | 27.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 48,786 | 29.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.99% | 24,809 | 29.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 153,963 | 20.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 48,812 | 33.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 20,431 | 30.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.08% | 40,419 | 21.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 15,730 | 22.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.55% | 9,238 | 51.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 9,010 | 47.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.02% | 18,164 | 30.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.35% | 776 | 44.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 4,300 | 36.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.04% | 3,696 | 26.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.27% | 2,116 | 61.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 2,078 | 33.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.96% | 10,264 | 51.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.27% | 15,820 | 12.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52% | 252 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.94% | 2,173 | 54.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.03% | 3,061 | 17.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 420 | 41.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 116 | 50.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.34% | 291 | 11.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.75% | 383 | 63.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 84 | 60.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.61% | 436 | 54.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 787 | 61.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.44% | 930 | 100.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 4,928 | 52.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.90% | 259 | 81.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 515 | 60.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.81% | 189 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 715 | 31.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.65% | 17 | 100.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.89% | 475 | 100.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.19% | 104 | 36.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.24% | 193 | 76.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.06% | 349 | 60.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.31% | 482 | 23.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 172 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66% | 157 | 100.0% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.65% | 276 | 100.0% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.71% | 51 | 100.0% |