Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Female Poverty
19.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,433,983 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635 and weighted average of 19.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.6% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants from Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants from Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants from Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.1% | 96.9% |
Mean | 2.1% | 24.5% |
Median | 1.2% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.60% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 27.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 17.1% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,590,445 | 21.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,099,189 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 10,937,420 | 18.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,037,494 | 17.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,866,176 | 16.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,402,488 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,099,433 | 17.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 512,820 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 416,718 | 21.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 360,727 | 14.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 243,366 | 20.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 266,441 | 19.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 80,338 | 22.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 119,488 | 20.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 66,268 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 9,071 | 25.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 120,356 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 34,790 | 13.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 17,498 | 23.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 8,254 | 32.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 14,006 | 8.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 15,612 | 12.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 14,895 | 20.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 24,230 | 35.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 5,787 | 30.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,223 | 19.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,144 | 11.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 321 | 50.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 22,992 | 3.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 1,341 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 28.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 1,336 | 44.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 45.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 874 | 16.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 24.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 25.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 19.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,426 | 43.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 2,208 | 19.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 14.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 1,009 | 18.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 3.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 50.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 66.7% |