Immigrants from Honduras Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Honduras
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from Honduras Single Female Poverty
25.5%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Honduras Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,392,656 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 25.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Honduras within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.85% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Honduras and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Honduras influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from Honduras simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Honduras by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Honduras are Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Immigrants from Honduras Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Honduras Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.086% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 75.2% |
| Range | 27.3% | 71.6% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 32.7% |
| Median | 6.2% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 40.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 12.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Honduras Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.086% | 173,916,261 | 21.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 65,655,764 | 23.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.50% | 26,924,943 | 23.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 15,398,762 | 24.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 9,448,749 | 24.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 4,875,056 | 24.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 4,091,999 | 24.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 3,886,667 | 23.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 2,950,995 | 26.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 1,697,668 | 27.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 1,289,630 | 25.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 3,442,980 | 30.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 1,114,809 | 25.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 1,255,987 | 26.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 408,334 | 23.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 310,136 | 27.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 176,400 | 29.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60% | 461,741 | 30.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 223,265 | 33.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 267,410 | 31.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 350,149 | 22.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.45% | 236,105 | 25.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 57,862 | 32.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 123,432 | 24.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.02% | 553,558 | 26.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 59,817 | 36.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 134,890 | 40.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 194,254 | 29.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 132,647 | 32.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 38,581 | 44.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.30% | 54,266 | 36.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.48% | 76,752 | 30.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.69% | 11,280 | 40.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.93% | 2,453 | 41.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 31,518 | 40.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.38% | 45,393 | 29.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 33,614 | 37.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 45,390 | 30.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 35,833 | 44.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.87% | 46,123 | 32.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.95% | 20,266 | 42.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.27% | 52,360 | 53.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 277 | 58.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.95% | 46,418 | 58.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 1,938 | 3.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.01% | 8,750 | 30.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.13% | 66,326 | 31.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 59,121 | 32.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 16,743 | 32.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 26,105 | 29.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 7,385 | 15.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.32% | 856 | 17.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.14% | 6,947 | 45.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.50% | 1,303 | 75.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.03% | 3,559 | 40.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 8,989 | 17.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.21% | 1,714 | 53.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 19.00% | 679 | 18.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.77% | 774 | 50.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.34% | 673 | 50.0% |