Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
21.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hawaiians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Hawaiians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants from Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.13% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 71.7% | 45.0% |
| Range | 71.6% | 40.5% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 23.0% |
| Median | 15.9% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 9.2% |
Correlation Details
| Hawaiian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 276,846,861 | 22.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 27,580,254 | 20.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 8,040,070 | 20.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 4,553,911 | 21.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,279,720 | 21.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 1,245,807 | 18.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 853,008 | 20.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 517,506 | 19.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 465,583 | 22.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 340,869 | 19.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 205,761 | 24.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 71,546 | 24.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 111,403 | 19.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 150,337 | 16.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 327,070 | 10.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 121,179 | 19.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 87,333 | 15.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 376,241 | 15.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 133,553 | 16.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 125,773 | 20.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.29% | 91,125 | 15.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 179,369 | 19.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 16,350 | 16.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 63,017 | 27.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.07% | 65,527 | 21.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.64% | 41,868 | 19.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23% | 95,035 | 17.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 25,506 | 26.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.14% | 124,786 | 19.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 70,200 | 16.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 3,484 | 21.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 12,190 | 38.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.21% | 7,704 | 16.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 1,383 | 21.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.37% | 1,318 | 23.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.69% | 1,984 | 21.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.62% | 7,198 | 39.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.70% | 7,436 | 25.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.52% | 3,221 | 5.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.19% | 6,626 | 18.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.66% | 11,029 | 27.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.27% | 2,742 | 4.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.91% | 4,555 | 27.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.04% | 1,278 | 20.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.61% | 5,267 | 37.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.65% | 8,017 | 22.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.59% | 1,462 | 40.6% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.00% | 920 | 29.2% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.47% | 2,872 | 25.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.25% | 480 | 45.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.69% | 10,307 | 16.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 465 | 13.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.24% | 4,827 | 35.7% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.53% | 3,553 | 34.8% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.37% | 10,042 | 41.5% |
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.87% | 4,475 | 6.5% |
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.64% | 12,114 | 37.4% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.73% | 65,116 | 30.7% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.93% | 3,412 | 16.0% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.47% | 2,853 | 16.2% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.69% | 2,157 | 41.2% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.63% | 12,370 | 12.1% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.73% | 1,436 | 44.6% |