Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Choctaw Single Female Poverty
27.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.36% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.081% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 98.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.1% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 16.9% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.0% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.7% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.9% | 16.4% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 254,635,470 | 22.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,239,466 | 25.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,940,094 | 26.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,594,610 | 27.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 545,308 | 31.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 396,537 | 29.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 213,073 | 33.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 153,995 | 31.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 98,863 | 34.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 41,274 | 35.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 40,669 | 35.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 33,189 | 37.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 20,084 | 46.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,295 | 28.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 39,092 | 31.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 23,069 | 32.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,583 | 46.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,410 | 35.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 2,686 | 25.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 9,171 | 43.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,404 | 43.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 39.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 3,461 | 50.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 36.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,837 | 34.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.59% | 10,442 | 42.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,402 | 16.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 4,910 | 38.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,205 | 59.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 23.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,629 | 24.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 1,323 | 35.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 4,061 | 22.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 45.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,478 | 38.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 40.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.79% | 9,159 | 49.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 41.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.89% | 270 | 68.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,234 | 41.2% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 35.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,562 | 40.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 33.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 41.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,919 | 55.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 666 | 40.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 45.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 47.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 52.8% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 25.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 83.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 38.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 21.5% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 28.9% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 39.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 36.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 41.4% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 70.6% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.51% | 526 | 64.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 24 | 50.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 71.4% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 42.9% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 33.3% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 50.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 97.6% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 31.4% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 12.6% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 57.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 100.0% |