Seminole Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Seminole Single Female Poverty
27.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
45.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,910,232 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.128 and weighted average of 27.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.37% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Ottawa (27.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Chippewa (27.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Arapaho (27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Chickasaw (26.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Comanche (26.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yaqui | 51.0 /100 | #316 | Average 26.3% |
| Menominee | 48.3 /100 | #317 | Average 26.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 48.0 /100 | #318 | Average 26.9% |
| Comanche | 48.0 /100 | #319 | Average 26.9% |
| Chickasaw | 47.9 /100 | #320 | Average 26.9% |
| Arapaho | 47.4 /100 | #321 | Average 27.0% |
| Ottawa | 45.9 /100 | #322 | Average 27.3% |
| Seminole | 45.9 /100 | #323 | Average 27.3% |
| Chippewa | 45.2 /100 | #324 | Average 27.5% |
| Creek | 43.3 /100 | #325 | Average 27.8% |
| Choctaw | 42.9 /100 | #326 | Average 27.9% |
| Pima | 42.2 /100 | #327 | Average 28.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 42.0 /100 | #328 | Average 28.1% |
| Kiowa | 41.1 /100 | #329 | Average 28.3% |
| Yup'ik | 40.1 /100 | #330 | Average 28.5% |
Seminole Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.019% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 70.8% |
| Range | 19.5% | 61.7% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 34.9% |
| Median | 3.2% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 42.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 14.2% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.019% | 103,005,344 | 24.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 7,172,348 | 25.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,937,086 | 24.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 1,938,091 | 26.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 852,145 | 28.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 511,231 | 28.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 314,656 | 29.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 159,105 | 27.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.77% | 180,104 | 29.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 127,154 | 34.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 86,305 | 25.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 33,560 | 33.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 42,773 | 25.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 91,460 | 31.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 25,103 | 25.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 97,030 | 22.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 25,738 | 19.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 31,826 | 25.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 10,444 | 33.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 11,747 | 52.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 29,836 | 26.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 365 | 14.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 1,307 | 57.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 34,792 | 26.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 3,437 | 40.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 23,222 | 41.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 46,790 | 33.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 1,411 | 48.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 1,261 | 31.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 447 | 54.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 23,342 | 37.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 3,876 | 33.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 1,334 | 65.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 6,380 | 18.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 8,890 | 14.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 7,064 | 29.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 317 | 41.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 5,753 | 15.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 2,333 | 67.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 1,987 | 41.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 3,760 | 37.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 1,520 | 50.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 2,905 | 48.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 1,751 | 49.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 1,662 | 27.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 1,379 | 70.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 308 | 41.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.31% | 226 | 54.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 395 | 30.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.50% | 354 | 66.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 410 | 22.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 327 | 30.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 904 | 32.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 250 | 14.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.64% | 1,846 | 20.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 1,037 | 43.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 198 | 16.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 12,421 | 33.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.75% | 400 | 9.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 13.00% | 5,693 | 41.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.08% | 3,135 | 44.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.25% | 166 | 14.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.31% | 2,854 | 60.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.36% | 7,131 | 38.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.80% | 1,158 | 42.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.95% | 78 | 50.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.47% | 570 | 35.7% |