Seminole Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Seminole Single Female Poverty
26.8%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,983,009 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 26.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.27% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.74%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Seminole Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.021% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 26.6% | 82.4% |
| Range | 26.5% | 71.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 32.3% |
| Median | 3.7% | 28.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 39.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 14.1% |
Correlation Details
| Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,090,622 | 23.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,324,041 | 23.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,232,835 | 26.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 912,539 | 25.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 457,362 | 28.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 178,468 | 28.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 139,189 | 38.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 124,575 | 31.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 174,825 | 21.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 61,427 | 27.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 29,969 | 35.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 7,215 | 38.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 23,474 | 16.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 56,492 | 22.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.91% | 5,926 | 27.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 34,281 | 37.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 19,939 | 40.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 21,950 | 38.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 5,794 | 23.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,358 | 48.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 4,003 | 51.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,350 | 20.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,326 | 36.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 6,028 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 49.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 44.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 33.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 1,977 | 16.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 35.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 11.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 22.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 245 | 25.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 1,086 | 25.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 82.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 28.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 35.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 24.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 11.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 35.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 33.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 20.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 445 | 64.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 41.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 11.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 57.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 45.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 41.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 48.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 51.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 564 | 14.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 550 | 17.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.56% | 64 | 25.0% |