Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty
20.3%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,673,972 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 20.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.0% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from North America influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Immigrants from North America simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants from North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North America Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 17.0% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.1% | 83.0% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 49.1% |
| Median | 7.4% | 41.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 70.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 47.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 28.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 28.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from North America Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 374,162,023 | 22.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 58,377,925 | 17.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 12,665,085 | 17.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 4,202,711 | 18.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 1,179,679 | 21.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 532,381 | 22.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 152,527 | 25.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 97,124 | 32.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.11% | 134,461 | 23.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 34,398 | 22.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 28,262 | 29.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 6,276 | 83.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 27,076 | 35.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 9,945 | 30.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 25,292 | 28.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.54% | 8,000 | 21.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 243 | 69.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 3,867 | 70.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 6,663 | 83.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.62% | 759 | 55.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,004 | 54.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 716 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.32% | 53 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.97% | 3,284 | 49.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.18% | 2,726 | 47.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70% | 63 | 50.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 4,196 | 71.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74% | 3,669 | 70.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 2,498 | 100.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 66 | 100.0% |