Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty
10.9%
POVERTY | MALES
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 10.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.13% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tlingit-Haida influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Tlingit-Haida simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants from Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants from Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants from France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants from Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida Data | Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.036% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 76.8% | 28.9% |
Range | 76.8% | 26.3% |
Mean | 18.7% | 11.7% |
Median | 9.0% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.2% | 5.2% |
Correlation Details
Tlingit-Haida Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.036% | 59,016,735 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 1,312,339 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 247,818 | 9.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 85,687 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 25,685 | 12.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 8,447 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 3,655 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 6,231 | 5.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 10,388 | 9.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.97% | 1,964 | 9.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 12.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 822 | 15.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 1,762 | 7.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 177 | 2.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.91% | 564 | 11.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,146 | 8.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 40 | 5.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.80% | 1,257 | 3.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 146 | 22.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 9.00% | 6,691 | 4.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 2,902 | 16.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 29,933 | 6.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 32,108 | 7.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 13,913 | 9.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 18,041 | 7.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 8,168 | 11.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.26% | 2,169 | 15.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.92% | 1,727 | 15.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 4,267 | 8.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.55% | 1,073 | 10.0% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.96% | 1,128 | 12.3% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.59% | 82 | 12.5% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.78% | 920 | 16.6% |
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.33% | 1,792 | 12.7% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.24% | 804 | 17.9% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.59% | 361 | 14.6% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.41% | 1,602 | 18.5% |
[ 74.5% - 75.0% ] 74.63% | 67 | 28.9% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.85% | 838 | 15.2% |